NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 259.2 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 13 November 2018 |
Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 vs 7856 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Around 68% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85526 vs 83044
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 19377
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 19377
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 85526 vs 83044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 19377 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 19377 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13640 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 584 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 | 85526 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 | 20206 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 | 20206 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 | 7856 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104 | TU104 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 13 November 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 169 | 195 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.2 GFLOPS | 222.5 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.59 TFLOPS | 14.24 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.294 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s | 222.5 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 13600 million |
Render output units | 64 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | |
API support |
||
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
DirectX | 12.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 416.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR6 |