NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and NVIDIA TITAN RTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 280 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 18 December 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 280 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 3072
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19986 vs 13640
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 827 vs 584
- Around 66% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 83044
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 19377
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 19377
- Around 92% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 15164 vs 7879
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4608 vs 3072 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19986 vs 13640 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 827 vs 584 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 vs 83044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 vs 19377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 vs 19377 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 15164 vs 7879 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13640 | 19986 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 584 | 827 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 | 138072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 | 15164 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104 | TU102 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 18 December 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 169 | 90 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.59 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.294 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 4608 |
| Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 280 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| DirectX | 12.0 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIACMP 40HX
