NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and NVIDIA TITAN Xp videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 682.6x more texture fill rate: 259.2 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 83044 vs 65368
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 10966
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3686
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 10966
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3686
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 6 April 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 vs 65368 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 vs 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 vs 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3343 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1405 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 3072
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17881 vs 13640
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 vs 584
- Around 29% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10152 vs 7879
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1405 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 3072 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17881 vs 13640 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 vs 584 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10152 vs 7879 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN Xp |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13640 | 17881 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 584 | 934 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 | 65368 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 | 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 | 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 | 10152 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 256.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2513.321 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.708 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.083 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1139.382 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN Xp | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU104 | GP102 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 6 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 169 | 212 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
Price now | $1,200 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.97 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1405 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.59 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.294 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s | 379.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 11,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 547.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 11408 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5X |