NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and NVIDIA TITAN Xp videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 682.6x more texture fill rate: 259.2 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
  • 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
  • Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 83044 vs 65368
  • Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 10966
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3686
  • Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 10966
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3686
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 6 April 2017
Texture fill rate 259.2 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 12 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 83044 vs 65368
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19377 vs 10966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 vs 3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19377 vs 10966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 vs 3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 3343

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp

  • 2.3x more core clock speed: 1405 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1350 MHz
  • Around 25% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 3072
  • Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17881 vs 13640
  • Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 vs 584
  • Around 29% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10152 vs 7879
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1405 MHz vs 600 MHz
Boost clock speed 1582 MHz vs 1350 MHz
Pipelines 3840 vs 3072
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 17881 vs 13640
PassMark - G2D Mark 934 vs 584
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 10152 vs 7879

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
13640
17881
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
584
934
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
83044
65368
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19377
10966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19377
10966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
7879
10152
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q NVIDIA TITAN Xp
PassMark - G3D Mark 13640 17881
PassMark - G2D Mark 584 934
Geekbench - OpenCL 83044 65368
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19377 10966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19377 10966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7879 10152
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 256.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2513.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 19.708
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 43.083
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1139.382

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q NVIDIA TITAN Xp

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name TU104 GP102
Launch date 27 May 2019 6 April 2017
Place in performance rating 169 212
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $1,199
Price now $1,200
Value for money (0-100) 15.97

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1350 MHz 1582 MHz
Core clock speed 600 MHz 1405 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 259.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 16.59 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 8.294 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3072 3840
Pixel fill rate 86.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 259.2 GTexel/s 379.7 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 11,800 million
Floating-point performance 12,150 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width IGP
Length 267 mm

API support

OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan
DirectX 12.0 (12_1)

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 12 GB
Memory bandwidth 547.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 11408 MHz
Memory type GDDR5X