NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 591.2x more texture fill rate: 259.2 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 584 vs 406
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 16337
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 16337
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 21 June 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 584 vs 406 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 vs 16337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 vs 16337 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1312 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3072
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16235 vs 13640
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 179995 vs 83044
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1312 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 3072 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16235 vs 13640 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 179995 vs 83044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13640 | 16235 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 584 | 406 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 | 179995 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 | 16337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 | 16337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3360 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 500.053 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7209.392 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.826 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.167 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1253.829 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Code name | TU104 | GV100 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 21 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 169 | 135 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1312 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.59 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.294 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s | 438.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 21,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 897.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIACMP 40HX
