NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs AMD FirePro W9100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 930 MHz
  • 1811.9x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 163.7 GTexel / s
  • Around 9% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2816
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 6.8x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 750 Watt
  • Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 7987
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 9143
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 9143
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 26 March 2014
Core clock speed 1035 MHz vs 930 MHz
Texture fill rate 296.6 GTexel/s vs 163.7 GTexel / s
Pipelines 3072 vs 2816
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt vs 750 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 14832 vs 7987
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19565 vs 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19565 vs 9143

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100

  • Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 752 vs 705
  • 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 vs 3346
  • 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 vs 3346
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 vs 3714
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 vs 3714
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 752 vs 705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 32085 vs 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 32085 vs 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8219 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8219 vs 3714

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
705
752
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
14832
7987
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19565
9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19565
9143
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
32085
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
32085
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
8219
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
8219
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile AMD FirePro W9100
PassMark - G2D Mark 705 752
PassMark - G3D Mark 14832 7987
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19565 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19565 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 32085
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 32085
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 8219
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 8219
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0
Geekbench - OpenCL 43046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 106.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1878.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 9.751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 82.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 511.115

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile AMD FirePro W9100

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 2.0
Code name TU104 Hawaii
Launch date 27 May 2019 26 March 2014
Place in performance rating 175 190
Type Laptop Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1545 MHz
Core clock speed 1035 MHz 930 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 296.6 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 18.98 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 9.492 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3072 2816
Pixel fill rate 98.88 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 296.6 GTexel/s 163.7 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt 750 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 6,200 million
Floating-point performance 5,238 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Dual-link DVI support
HD сomponent video output
StereoOutput3D

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width IGP
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Form factor Full Height / Full Length
Length 275 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 16 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 320 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 512 Bit
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz