NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- 772.4x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 12844
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 13848
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 13848
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3680
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3680
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 10 July 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 vs 12844 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 vs 13848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 vs 13848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3680 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 769 vs 705
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 3072 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 769 vs 705 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 769 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 | 12844 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 | 13848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 | 13848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3680 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64683 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 174.714 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3924.968 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.305 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1226.861 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 10 July 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 175 | 196 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.492 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 12,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
IntelArc A730M
