NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- 980.8x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 302.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 91% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 210 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 12354
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 12822
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 12822
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 14 August 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 302.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 210 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 vs 12354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 vs 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 vs 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3709 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1138 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 3072
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 828 vs 705
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1138 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 3072 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 828 vs 705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 828 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 | 12354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 | 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 | 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3709 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62249 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 153.117 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.138 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.901 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 126.528 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1172.788 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 14 August 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 176 | 238 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1138 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.492 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 302.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 210 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 9,677 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 402.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Memory clock speed | 1572 MHz |