NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1250 MHz
  • 980.8x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 302.4 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • Around 91% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 210 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 12354
  • Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 12822
  • Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 12822
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 14 August 2017
Boost clock speed 1545 MHz vs 1250 MHz
Texture fill rate 296.6 GTexel/s vs 302.4 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt vs 210 Watt
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 14832 vs 12354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19565 vs 12822
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19565 vs 12822
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 vs 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 vs 3709

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

  • Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1138 MHz vs 1035 MHz
  • Around 17% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 3072
  • Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 828 vs 705
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1138 MHz vs 1035 MHz
Pipelines 3584 vs 3072
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 828 vs 705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3346

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
705
828
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
14832
12354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19565
12822
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19565
12822
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
3709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
3709
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
PassMark - G2D Mark 705 828
PassMark - G3D Mark 14832 12354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19565 12822
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19565 12822
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 3709
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0
Geekbench - OpenCL 62249
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 153.117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1722.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 11.901
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 126.528
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1172.788

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name TU104 Vega 10
Launch date 27 May 2019 14 August 2017
Place in performance rating 176 238
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $399

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1545 MHz 1250 MHz
Core clock speed 1035 MHz 1138 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 296.6 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 18.98 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 9.492 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3072 3584
Pixel fill rate 98.88 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 296.6 GTexel/s 302.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt 210 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 12,500 million
Floating-point performance 9,677 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width IGP
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 402.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 2048 Bit
Memory type GDDR6 HBM2
Memory clock speed 1572 MHz