NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 67% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 5010.1x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 3072 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 6316
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 6316
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 13 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 vs 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 vs 6316 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 3346
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 3346
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3714
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3714
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8390 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8390 vs 3714 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 | 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 | 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 27566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 27566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 8390 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70535 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 176 | 163 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.492 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 2,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz |