NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 M390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 723 MHz
  • 3205.1x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2048
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 435
  • 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 3597
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 6508
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 6508
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 5 May 2015
Core clock speed 1035 MHz vs 723 MHz
Texture fill rate 296.6 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
Pipelines 3072 vs 2048
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 705 vs 435
PassMark - G3D Mark 14832 vs 3597
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19565 vs 6508
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19565 vs 6508

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390X

  • Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 110 Watt
  • 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 24690 vs 3346
  • 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 24690 vs 3346
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8593 vs 3714
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8593 vs 3714
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 110 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 24690 vs 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 24690 vs 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8593 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8593 vs 3714

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390X

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
705
435
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
14832
3597
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19565
6508
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19565
6508
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
24690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
24690
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
8593
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
8593
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile AMD Radeon R9 M390X
PassMark - G2D Mark 705 435
PassMark - G3D Mark 14832 3597
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19565 6508
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19565 6508
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 24690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 24690
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 8593
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 8593
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0
Geekbench - OpenCL 22044
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 64.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1284.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.881
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 78.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 312.822

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile AMD Radeon R9 M390X

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 3.0
Code name TU104 Amethyst
Launch date 27 May 2019 5 May 2015
Place in performance rating 176 303
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 300 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1545 MHz
Core clock speed 1035 MHz 723 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 296.6 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 18.98 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 9.492 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3072 2048
Pixel fill rate 98.88 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 296.6 GTexel/s 92.54 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 5,000 million
Floating-point performance 2,961 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width IGP
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 12
OpenCL 1.2 Not Listed
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan
Mantle

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 bit
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore