NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 M390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 723 MHz
- 3205.1x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 435
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 3597
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 6508
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 6508
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 vs 435 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 vs 3597 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 vs 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 vs 6508 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390X
- Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 110 Watt
- 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 24690 vs 3346
- 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 24690 vs 3346
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8593 vs 3714
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8593 vs 3714
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 110 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 24690 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 24690 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8593 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8593 vs 3714 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390X
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 M390X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 435 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 | 3597 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 | 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 | 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 24690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 24690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 8593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 8593 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22044 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.199 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1284.053 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.881 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.169 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 312.822 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 M390X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Amethyst |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 176 | 303 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 723 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.492 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 5,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |