NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 722 MHz
- 4279.3x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 69.31 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 3072 vs 1536
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 556
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 3568
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 30 August 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz vs 722 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 69.31 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 1536 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 vs 556 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 vs 3568 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 110 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 110 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 556 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 | 3568 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | TU104 | GM204 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 30 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 175 | 187 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 722 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.492 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 1536 |
Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 69.31 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 5,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 160.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz |