NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 11691
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 14998
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 14998
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 14 March 2019 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 vs 11691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 vs 14998 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 vs 14998 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 782 vs 705
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 vs 705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3714 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 782 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 | 11691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 | 14998 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 | 14998 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3717 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 5414 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57151 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.366 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1892.505 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.492 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.54 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 887.857 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104 | TU116 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 14 March 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 175 | 240 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $219 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.492 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 6,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
| Memory clock speed | 8004 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
IntelArc A730M
