NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
  • Around 60% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 1920
  • Around 45% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 160 Watt
  • 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
  • Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 14150
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 7 January 2019
Pipelines 3072 vs 1920
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt vs 160 Watt
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 14832 vs 14150

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

  • Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1035 MHz
  • Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1545 MHz
  • Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 705
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 19565
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 19565
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3346
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3346
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3714
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3714
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1365 MHz vs 1035 MHz
Boost clock speed 1680 MHz vs 1545 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 751 vs 705
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20094 vs 19565
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20094 vs 19565
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 6714 vs 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 6714 vs 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 7442 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 7442 vs 3714

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
705
751
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
14832
14150
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19565
20094
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19565
20094
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
6714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
6714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
7442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
7442
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G2D Mark 705 751
PassMark - G3D Mark 14832 14150
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19565 20094
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19565 20094
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 6714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 6714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 7442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 7442
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0 7491
Geekbench - OpenCL 70387
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 220.337
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3131.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 21.852
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 135.923
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1141.283

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

Essentials

Architecture Turing Turing
Code name TU104 TU106
Launch date 27 May 2019 7 January 2019
Place in performance rating 176 150
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $349
Price now $349.99
Value for money (0-100) 62.74

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1545 MHz 1680 MHz
Core clock speed 1035 MHz 1365 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 296.6 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 18.98 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 9.492 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3072 1920
Pixel fill rate 98.88 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 296.6 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt 160 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 10,800 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
DisplayPort count 2
DisplayPort support
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 8-pin
Width IGP
Length 229 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 12
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 192 Bit
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz