NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 1920
- Around 45% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 14150
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 7 January 2019 |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 1920 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 vs 14150 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 705
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 19565
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 19565
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3346
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3346
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3714
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3714
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 vs 705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 vs 19565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 vs 19565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 vs 3714 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 751 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 | 14150 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 7442 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 7491 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70387 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.337 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3131.344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.852 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.923 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104 | TU106 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 7 January 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 176 | 150 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.492 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz |