NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 1005 MHz
  • Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1200 MHz
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3290
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3290
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3652
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3652
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 13 August 2018
Core clock speed 1035 MHz vs 1005 MHz
Boost clock speed 1545 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 vs 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 vs 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 vs 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 vs 3652

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

  • Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 705
  • Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 14832
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 19565
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 19565
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 869 vs 705
PassMark - G3D Mark 19370 vs 14832
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 21578 vs 19565
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 21578 vs 19565

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
705
869
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
14832
19370
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19565
21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19565
21578
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
3290
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
3652
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
PassMark - G2D Mark 705 869
PassMark - G3D Mark 14832 19370
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19565 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19565 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 3652
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0 0
Geekbench - OpenCL 136722
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 401.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 6432.348
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 43.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 215.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2101.927

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

Essentials

Architecture Turing Turing
Code name TU104 TU102
Launch date 27 May 2019 13 August 2018
Place in performance rating 175 103
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $9,999

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1545 MHz 1200 MHz
Core clock speed 1035 MHz 1005 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 296.6 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 18.98 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 9.492 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3072
Pixel fill rate 98.88 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 296.6 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 18,600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 8-pin
Width IGP
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit
Memory type GDDR6
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz