NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA TITAN V
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and NVIDIA TITAN V videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- 637x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 465.6 GTexel / s
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 15401
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 15401
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 7 December 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 465.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 vs 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 vs 15401 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3072
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 864 vs 705
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19773 vs 14832
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3346
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3346
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 3072 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 864 vs 705 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19773 vs 14832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3714 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | NVIDIA TITAN V |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 864 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 | 19773 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3716 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 13134 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 150662 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3583.136 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.669 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Code name | TU104 | GV100 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 7 December 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 176 | 149 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.492 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 465.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,899 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 652.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 3072 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz |