NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 82% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 350 Watt
• 28x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 500 MHz
• Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16033 vs 8137
• Around 95% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 vs 53806
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 226.447 vs 141.474
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 vs 3621.344
• Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 25.476 vs 13.132
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.544 vs 112.973
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1106.12 vs 799.933
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 10141
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 10141

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo

• 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3358
• 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	16033 8137
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	748 745
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	105171 53806
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	226.447 141.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4161.764 3621.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.476 13.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	118.544 112.973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1106.12 799.933
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19811 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 38251
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19811 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 38251

Compare specifications (specs)