NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 62% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 580 Watt
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5400 MHz
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 25.476 vs 21.128
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 3 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 580 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 vs 21.128 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16029 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 | 21.128 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1106.12 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Grenada |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 3 September 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,299 | $1,399 |
Place in performance rating | 153 | 247 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 580 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 6,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,120 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2x 2560 | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 4x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5400 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 345.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 2x 512 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |