NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs AMD Radeon R9 M485X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and AMD Radeon R9 M485X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 723 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16031 vs 3661
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 749 vs 417
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 15 May 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16031 vs 3661 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 vs 417 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M485X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | AMD Radeon R9 M485X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16031 | 3661 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 | 417 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1106.12 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | AMD Radeon R9 M485X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Amethyst |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 15 May 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,299 | |
Place in performance rating | 154 | 276 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | 723 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 5,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Enduro |