NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740A
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 65% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 980 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 7.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 24x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16059 vs 668
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 749 vs 300
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 26 August 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16059 vs 668 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 vs 300 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740A
- 6.1x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 200 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16059 | 668 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 | 300 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1106.12 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | TU104 | GK208 |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 26 August 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,299 | |
Place in performance rating | 154 | 507 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | 980 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 15.68 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3 |