NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1481 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 11008 MHz
- Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 vs 62308
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 226.447 vs 205.837
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 vs 2406.499
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 25.476 vs 19.591
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.544 vs 25.833
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1106.12 vs 1002.573
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 15019
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 15019
- Around 8% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 vs 9873
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 10 March 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1481 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 11008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 vs 62308 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 vs 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 vs 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 vs 19.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 vs 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1106.12 vs 1002.573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 vs 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 vs 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 vs 9873 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18558 vs 16042
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 vs 749
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18558 vs 16042 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 vs 749 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16042 | 18558 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 | 937 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 | 62308 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 | 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 | 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 | 19.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 | 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1106.12 | 1002.573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 | 9873 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU104 | GP102 |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 10 March 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,299 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 154 | 200 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Price now | $826.98 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 11,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Pipelines | 3584 | |
Texture fill rate | 354.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 11008 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 11 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 484.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 352 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5X | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |