NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs AMD FirePro W9100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 930 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 750 Watt
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 vs 7987
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 752
• Around 72% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74179 vs 43046
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 106.585
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 vs 1878.403
• 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 9.751
• Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.677 vs 82.208
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 vs 511.115
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 vs 9143
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 vs 9143

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100

• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 vs 3717
• 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 vs 3357
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 vs 3717
• 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 vs 3357

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	18872 7987
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	791 752
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	74179 43046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	488.989 106.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5451.006 1878.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.461 9.751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	153.677 82.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1534.582 511.115
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19571 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 32085
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19571 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 32085

Compare specifications (specs)