NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 7.4x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
• Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 vs 12844
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 769
• Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74179 vs 64683
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 174.714
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 vs 3924.968
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 17.305
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 vs 1226.861
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 vs 13848
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3680
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3336
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 vs 13848
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3680
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3336

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 153.677

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	18872 12844
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	791 769
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	74179 64683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	488.989 174.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5451.006 3924.968
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.461 17.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	153.677 175.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1534.582 1226.861
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19571 13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19571 13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3336

Compare specifications (specs)