NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and AMD Radeon Pro 555X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Around 59% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 907 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5100 MHz
- 5.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74179 vs 12519
- 13.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 35.283
- 8.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 vs 668.308
- 13.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 3.158
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.677 vs 49.593
- 9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 vs 170.952
- 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 vs 4093
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 2350
- 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 vs 4093
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 2350
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 907 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5100 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 vs 12519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 vs 35.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 vs 668.308 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 vs 3.158 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 vs 49.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 vs 170.952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 vs 4093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 2350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 vs 4093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 2350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555X
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | AMD Radeon Pro 555X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 | 12519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 | 35.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 | 668.308 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 | 3.158 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 | 49.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 | 170.952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 | 4093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 2350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 | 4093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 2350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | AMD Radeon Pro 555X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | TU102 | Polaris 21 |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 16 July 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $6,299 | |
Place in performance rating | 112 | 980 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz | 907 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 18,600 million | 3,000 million |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5100 MHz |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |