NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1406 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1677 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 7.4x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 80% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 vs 7765
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 8 August 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1406 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1677 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 vs 7765 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 | 7765 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU102 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 8 August 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $6,299 | |
Place in performance rating | 112 | 256 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1677 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz | 1406 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 18,600 million | |
Floating-point performance | 13,738 gflops | |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Texture fill rate | 429.3 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | |
Memory type | HBM2 |