NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1582 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 11008 MHz
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 vs 18557
• Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74179 vs 62406
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 205.837
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 vs 2406.499
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 19.591
• 5.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.677 vs 25.833
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 vs 1002.573
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 vs 15019
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 vs 15019
• Around 41% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 vs 9870

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)

• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 1440 MHz
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 vs 791

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	18872 18557
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	791 937
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	74179 62406
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	488.989 205.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5451.006 2406.499
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.461 19.591
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	153.677 25.833
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1534.582 1002.573
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19571 15019
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19571 15019
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	13943 9870

Compare specifications (specs)