NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1304 MHz
• Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1442 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• 9.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1430 MHz
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 vs 16374
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 355.937
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 vs 4858.771
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 25.191
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.677 vs 144.928
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 vs 1056.078
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 vs 16640
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 vs 16640

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GP100

• Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 235 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 791
• Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 84757 vs 74179
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13211 vs 3717
• 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 vs 3357
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13211 vs 3717
• 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 vs 3357

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	18872 16374
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	791 847
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	74179 84757
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	488.989 355.937
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5451.006 4858.771
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.461 25.191
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	153.677 144.928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1534.582 1056.078
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19571 16640
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 13211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 22133
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19571 16640
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 13211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 22133

Compare specifications (specs)