NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

• Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1005 MHz
• Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 401.574
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3652
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3290
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3652
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3290

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 18872
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 791
• Around 84% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 136722 vs 74179
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 5451.006
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 41.461
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 153.677
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 1534.582
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 19571
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 19571

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	18872 19370
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	791 869
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	74179 136722
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	488.989 401.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5451.006 6432.348
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.461 43.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	153.677 215.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1534.582 2101.927
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19571 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19571 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3290

Compare specifications (specs)