NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA TITAN V

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and NVIDIA TITAN V videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1455 MHz
• 8.2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1700 MHz
• Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 270.561
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 vs 3583.136
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 30.857
• 7.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.677 vs 20.669
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 vs 1504.373
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 vs 15401
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 vs 15401
• Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 vs 13111

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V

• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19884 vs 18872
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 868 vs 791
• 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 150662 vs 74179
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3357
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3357

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	18872 19884
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	791 868
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	74179 150662
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	488.989 270.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5451.006 3583.136
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.461 30.857
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	153.677 20.669
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1534.582 1504.373
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19571 15401
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 4193
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19571 15401
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 4193
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	13943 13111

Compare specifications (specs)