NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1230 MHz
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1752 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 vs 8260
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 327
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 vs 9969
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3521
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 vs 9969
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3521
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 27 March 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1230 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1752 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 vs 8260 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 vs 327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 vs 9969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3521 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 vs 9969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3521 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 163779 vs 74179
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 592.008 vs 488.989
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 46.266 vs 41.461
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 271.318 vs 153.677
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2169.759 vs 1534.582
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 163779 vs 74179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 592.008 vs 488.989 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 46.266 vs 41.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 271.318 vs 153.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2169.759 vs 1534.582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 | 8260 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 | 327 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 | 163779 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 | 592.008 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 | 46.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 | 271.318 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 | 2169.759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 | 9969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3521 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 | 9969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3521 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Code name | TU102 | GV100 |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 27 March 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $6,299 | |
Place in performance rating | 112 | 155 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz | 1230 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 18,600 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,131 gflops | |
Pipelines | 5120 | |
Texture fill rate | 441.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1752 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 897.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | |
Memory type | HBM2 |