NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs AMD FirePro W7170M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and AMD FirePro W7170M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 723 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
  • 6.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 3162
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 418
  • 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 136722 vs 50809
  • 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 6796
  • 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 6796
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 August 2018 vs 2 October 2015
Core clock speed 1005 MHz vs 723 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 19370 vs 3162
PassMark - G2D Mark 869 vs 418
Geekbench - OpenCL 136722 vs 50809
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 21578 vs 6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 21578 vs 6796

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7170M

  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3722 vs 3652
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 vs 3290
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3722 vs 3652
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 vs 3290
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3722 vs 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3362 vs 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3722 vs 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3362 vs 3290

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7170M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
19370
3162
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
869
418
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
136722
50809
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
21578
6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3652
3722
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3290
3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
21578
6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3652
3722
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3290
3362
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 AMD FirePro W7170M
PassMark - G3D Mark 19370 3162
PassMark - G2D Mark 869 418
Geekbench - OpenCL 136722 50809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 401.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 6432.348
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 43.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 215.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2101.927
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 21578 6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3652 3722
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3290 3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 21578 6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3652 3722
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3290 3362
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 AMD FirePro W7170M

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 3.0
Code name TU102 Amethyst
Launch date 13 August 2018 2 October 2015
Launch price (MSRP) $9,999
Place in performance rating 103 420
Type Workstation Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz
Core clock speed 1005 MHz 723 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 18,600 million 5,000 million
Floating-point performance 2,961 gflops
Pipelines 2048
Texture fill rate 92.54 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin None
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 5000 MHz
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory type GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
Enduro