NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs AMD FirePro W9100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 930 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 750 Watt
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19286 vs 7957
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 868 vs 762
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 136245 vs 43046
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 vs 106.585
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 1878.403
- 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 9.751
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 82.208
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 511.115
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 9143
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 9143
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 26 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 750 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19286 vs 7957 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 868 vs 762 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 136245 vs 43046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 vs 106.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 vs 1878.403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 vs 9.751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 vs 82.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 vs 511.115 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 vs 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 vs 9143 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 vs 3652
- 9.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 vs 3290
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 vs 3652
- 9.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 vs 3290
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8219 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 32085 vs 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8219 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 32085 vs 3290 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | AMD FirePro W9100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19286 | 7957 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 868 | 762 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 136245 | 43046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | 106.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | 1878.403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | 9.751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | 82.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 | 511.115 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 | 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 8219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | 32085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 | 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 8219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | 32085 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | AMD FirePro W9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | TU102 | Hawaii |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 26 March 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $9,999 | |
Place in performance rating | 103 | 191 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 930 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 750 Watt |
Transistor count | 18,600 million | 6,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 5,238 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2816 | |
Texture fill rate | 163.7 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 275 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |