NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 7.4x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 12844
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 769
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 136722 vs 64683
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 vs 174.714
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 3924.968
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 17.305
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 175.219
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 1226.861
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 13848
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 13848

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1005 MHz
• Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3680 vs 3652
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 3290
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3680 vs 3652
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 3290

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	19370 12844
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	869 769
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	136722 64683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	401.574 174.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6432.348 3924.968
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.914 17.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	215.219 175.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2101.927 1226.861
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21578 13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3652 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3290 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21578 13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3652 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3290 3336

Compare specifications (specs)