NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
• 28x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 500 MHz
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 8137
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 745
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 137262 vs 53806
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 vs 141.474
• Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 3621.344
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 13.132
• Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 112.973
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 799.933
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 10141
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 10141

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo

• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3652
• 11.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3290
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3652
• 11.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3290

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	19370 8137
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	869 745
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	137262 53806
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	401.574 141.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6432.348 3621.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.914 13.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	215.219 112.973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2101.927 799.933
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21578 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3652 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3290 38251
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21578 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3652 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3290 38251

Compare specifications (specs)