NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and AMD Radeon Pro SSG videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 7.4x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 10972
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 588
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 vs 170.923
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 3178.443
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 16.732
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 173.59
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 1231.051
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 11029
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 11029
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 8 August 2017 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 vs 10972 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 vs 588 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 vs 170.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 vs 3178.443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 vs 16.732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 vs 173.59 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 vs 1231.051 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 vs 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 vs 11029 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro SSG
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7766 vs 3652
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7766 vs 3652
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7766 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7766 vs 3652 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro SSG
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | AMD Radeon Pro SSG |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 | 10972 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 | 588 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 136722 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | 170.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | 3178.443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | 16.732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | 173.59 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 | 1231.051 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 | 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 7766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 | 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 7766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | AMD Radeon Pro SSG | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU102 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 8 August 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $9,999 | $6,999 |
Place in performance rating | 103 | 158 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 18,600 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | |
Memory type | HBM2 |