NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 295 Watt
- 7.4x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19286 vs 14404
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 868 vs 801
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 vs 195.478
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 2129.009
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 14.889
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 129.271
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 1328.033
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 14744
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 14744
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 7 August 2017 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 295 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19286 vs 14404 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 868 vs 801 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 vs 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 vs 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 vs 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 vs 129.271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 vs 1328.033 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 vs 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 vs 14744 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1247 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1546 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 204168 vs 136245
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3290
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3290
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1247 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1546 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 vs 136245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3290 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19286 | 14404 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 868 | 801 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 136245 | 204168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | 129.271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 | 1328.033 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 7527 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU102 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 7 August 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $9,999 | $499 |
Place in performance rating | 103 | 172 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Price now | $449.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 41.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1546 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1247 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 295 Watt |
Transistor count | 18,600 million | 12,500 million |
Compute units | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 12.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 8192 | |
Pixel fill rate | 98.90 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Texture fill rate | 395.80 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 279 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | |
Memory type | HBM2 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |