NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 7.4x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19286 vs 13327
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 868 vs 750
- Around 79% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 136245 vs 76021
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 vs 190.25
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 3611.018
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 17.789
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 181.113
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 1373.944
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 12980
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 12980
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 27 June 2017 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19286 vs 13327 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 868 vs 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 136245 vs 76021 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 vs 190.25 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 vs 3611.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 vs 17.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 vs 181.113 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 vs 1373.944 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 vs 12980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 vs 12980 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1382 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3290
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3290
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1382 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3290 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19286 | 13327 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 868 | 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 136245 | 76021 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | 190.25 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | 3611.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | 17.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | 181.113 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 | 1373.944 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 | 12980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 | 12980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 7074 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU102 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 27 June 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $9,999 | $999 |
Place in performance rating | 103 | 198 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Price now | $999.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.37 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1382 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 18,600 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 13,107 gflops | |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Texture fill rate | 409.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | |
Memory type | HBM2 |