NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
• Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 9982
• Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 437
• 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 136722 vs 37928
• Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 vs 214.123
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 2293.496
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 12.704
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 139.717
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 692.9
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 14915
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 14915

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

• Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1005 MHz
• Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1379 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 vs 3652
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 vs 3290
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 vs 3652
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 vs 3290

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	19370 9982
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	869 437
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	136722 37928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	401.574 214.123
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6432.348 2293.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.914 12.704
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	215.219 139.717
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2101.927 692.9
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21578 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3652 8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3290 8048
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21578 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3652 8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3290 8048

Compare specifications (specs)