NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
  • Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 10008 MHz
  • Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 11482
  • Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 731
  • 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 136722 vs 45938
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 17105
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 17105
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 August 2018 vs 27 June 2017
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 16 nm
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 10008 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 19370 vs 11482
PassMark - G2D Mark 869 vs 731
Geekbench - OpenCL 136722 vs 45938
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 21578 vs 17105
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 21578 vs 17105

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q

  • Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 1005 MHz
  • Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 1200 MHz
  • Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5581 vs 3652
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3290
  • Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5581 vs 3652
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3290
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1290 MHz vs 1005 MHz
Boost clock speed 1468 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 5581 vs 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3360 vs 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 5581 vs 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3360 vs 3290

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
19370
11482
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
869
731
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
136722
45938
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
21578
17105
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3652
5581
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3290
3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
21578
17105
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3652
5581
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3290
3360
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark 19370 11482
PassMark - G2D Mark 869 731
Geekbench - OpenCL 136722 45938
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 401.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 6432.348
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 43.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 215.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2101.927
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 21578 17105
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3652 5581
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3290 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 21578 17105
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3652 5581
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3290 3360
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0 6008

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name TU102 GP104
Launch date 13 August 2018 27 June 2017
Launch price (MSRP) $9,999
Place in performance rating 103 182
Type Workstation Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 1468 MHz
Core clock speed 1005 MHz 1290 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 18,600 million 7,200 million
Floating-point performance 7,516 gflops
Pipelines 2560
Texture fill rate 234.9 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C No outputs
G-SYNC support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin None
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 10008 MHz
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 320.3 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory type GDDR5X
Shared memory 0

Technologies

Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready