NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and NVIDIA Quadro P5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 55% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 9016 MHz
• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 12384
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 671
• 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 136722 vs 49641
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 vs 223.558
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 2698.914
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 14.206
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 140.845
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 927.006
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 15489
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3652 vs 3409
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3290 vs 3077
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 15489
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3652 vs 3409
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3290 vs 3077

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5000

• Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1005 MHz
• Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	19370 12384
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	869 671
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	136722 49641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	401.574 223.558
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6432.348 2698.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.914 14.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	215.219 140.845
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2101.927 927.006
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21578 15489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3652 3409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3290 3077
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21578 15489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3652 3409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3290 3077

Compare specifications (specs)