NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs NVIDIA TITAN V

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and NVIDIA TITAN V videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• 8.2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1700 MHz
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 vs 270.561
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 3583.136
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 30.857
• 10.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 20.669
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 1504.373
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 15401
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 15401

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V

• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1005 MHz
• Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19884 vs 19370
• Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 150662 vs 136722
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3652
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3290
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3652
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3290

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	19370 19884
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	869 868
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	136722 150662
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	401.574 270.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6432.348 3583.136
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.914 30.857
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	215.219 20.669
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2101.927 1504.373
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21578 15401
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3652 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3290 4193
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21578 15401
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3652 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3290 4193

Compare specifications (specs)