NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 9.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1430 MHz
- Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 vs 205.417
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 4198.719
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 19.996
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 940.599
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 20 June 2016 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1430 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 vs 205.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 vs 4198.719 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 vs 19.996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 vs 940.599 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1190 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 206586 vs 136722
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 218.069 vs 215.219
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1190 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1329 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 206586 vs 136722 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 218.069 vs 215.219 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 136722 | 206586 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | 205.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | 4198.719 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | 19.996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | 218.069 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 | 940.599 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU102 | GP100 |
| Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 20 June 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $9,999 | $4,599 |
| Place in performance rating | 103 | 124 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1329 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1190 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 18,600 million | 15,300 million |
| Floating-point performance | 10,609 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 3584 | |
| Texture fill rate | 331.5 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1430 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 720.9 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
NVIDIARTX A4000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700M
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
IntelArc A580
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile 12GB
