NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1752 MHz
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 16235
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 406
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 41.826
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 73.167
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 1253.829
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 16337
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 16337

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

• Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1312 MHz vs 1005 MHz
• Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 179995 vs 136722
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 500.053 vs 401.574
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7209.392 vs 6432.348
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3652
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3290
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3652
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3290

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	19370 16235
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	869 406
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	136722 179995
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	401.574 500.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6432.348 7209.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.914 41.826
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	215.219 73.167
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2101.927 1253.829
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21578 16337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3652 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3290 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21578 16337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3652 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3290 3360

Compare specifications (specs)