NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 9% higher core clock speed: 795 / 1230 MHz vs 1127 MHz
  • Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1178 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 1142.9x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8878 vs 7218
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8878 vs 7218
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3691
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3691
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3335
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3335
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6717 vs 6064
  • Around 84% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33715 vs 18306
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 22 January 2015
Core clock speed 795 / 1230 MHz vs 1127 MHz
Boost clock speed 1455 MHz vs 1178 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8878 vs 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8878 vs 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 vs 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 vs 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3335
PassMark - G3D Mark 6717 vs 6064
Geekbench - OpenCL 33715 vs 18306

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
  • Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 675 vs 442
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 1024 vs 768
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 675 vs 442

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8878
7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8878
7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
3691
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3335
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3335
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
442
675
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6717
6064
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
33715
18306
Name NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8878 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8878 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 3335
PassMark - G2D Mark 442 675
PassMark - G3D Mark 6717 6064
Geekbench - OpenCL 33715 18306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 73.733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 792.44
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 200.825
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2283

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

Essentials

Architecture Turing Maxwell 2.0
Code name N19P-Q1 GM206
Launch date 27 May 2019 22 January 2015
Place in performance rating 364 496
Type Mobile Workstation Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $199
Price now $229.99
Value for money (0-100) 34.63

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1455 MHz 1178 MHz
Core clock speed 795 / 1230 MHz 1127 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 768 1024
CUDA cores 1024
Floating-point performance 2,413 gflops
Texture fill rate 72 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 120 Watt
Transistor count 2,940 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Laptop size medium sized
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 9.5" (24.1 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 400 Watt
SLI options 2x
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pins

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 7.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Memory bandwidth 112 GB / s
Shared memory 0

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI Internal
Display Connectors Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Technologies

CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost