NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 795 / 1230 MHz vs 1127 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1178 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 1142.9x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8878 vs 7218
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8878 vs 7218
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3691
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3691
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3335
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3335
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6717 vs 6064
- Around 84% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33715 vs 18306
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 22 January 2015 |
Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz vs 1127 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1178 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8878 vs 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8878 vs 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3335 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6717 vs 6064 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33715 vs 18306 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 675 vs 442
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 675 vs 442 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8878 | 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8878 | 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3335 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 | 675 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6717 | 6064 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33715 | 18306 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.733 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 792.44 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.888 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.338 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 200.825 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2283 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N19P-Q1 | GM206 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 22 January 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 364 | 496 |
Type | Mobile Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 34.63 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz | 1127 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1024 |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,413 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 72 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
SLI options | 2x | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pins | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost |