NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs AMD FirePro S7150
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and AMD FirePro S7150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 593.9x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 117.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6618 vs 2727
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32981 vs 29623
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.83 vs 27.544
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 6147
- 5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 583
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 6147
- 5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 583
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 1 February 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s vs 117.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6618 vs 2727 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 vs 29623 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 vs 27.544 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 vs 6147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 vs 6147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 583 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7150
- 2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 423
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4359 vs 3718
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4359 vs 3718
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 768 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 vs 423 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4359 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4359 vs 3718 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S7150
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | AMD FirePro S7150 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6618 | 2727 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 | 465 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 29623 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 27.544 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 6147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 4359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 6147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 4359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 570.969 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.687 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.637 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | AMD FirePro S7150 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Tonga |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 1 February 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 390 | 632 |
Type | Mobile Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,399 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s | 117.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 5,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |