NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs AMD FirePro W4300
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and AMD FirePro W4300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 930 MHz
- 1564.5x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6000 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6603 vs 2818
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32981 vs 10312
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.83 vs 31.528
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 3572
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 3572
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 1 December 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s vs 44.64 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6603 vs 2818 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 vs 10312 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 vs 31.528 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 vs 3572 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 vs 3572 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4300
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 421
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6161 vs 3718
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17597 vs 3359
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6161 vs 3718
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17597 vs 3359
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 vs 421 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6161 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17597 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6161 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17597 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4300
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | AMD FirePro W4300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6603 | 2818 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 421 | 659 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 10312 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 31.528 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 3572 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 6161 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 17597 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 3572 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 6161 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 17597 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 828.57 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.985 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.153 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 152.484 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | AMD FirePro W4300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Bonaire |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 1 December 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 391 | 416 |
Type | Mobile Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 930 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s | 44.64 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 2,080 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 171 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |