NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1704 MHz
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6603 vs 4979
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 421 vs 371
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32981 vs 23380
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 1715
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 1177
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1724
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 1715
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 1177
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1724
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 27 June 2017 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1704 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6603 vs 4979 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 421 vs 371 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 vs 23380 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 vs 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 1177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 1724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 vs 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 1177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 1724 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 102.628 vs 87.83
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.628 vs 87.83 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6603 | 4979 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 421 | 371 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 23380 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 102.628 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 1177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 1724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 1177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 1724 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1762.559 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.26 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.313 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 617.099 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 27 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 391 | 682 |
Type | Mobile Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 12,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1704 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 |