NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs AMD Radeon Pro 570

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and AMD Radeon Pro 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro T1000

AMD Radeon Pro 570

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1105 MHz
623.6x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 112.0 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
2.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 120 Watt
Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6800 MHz
Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6603 vs 6337
Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32981 vs 30303
Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.83 vs 74.958
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 7664
Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 2340
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 7664
Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 2340

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 5 June 2017
Core clock speed	1395 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz vs 1105 MHz
Texture fill rate	69.84 GTexel/s vs 112.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 120 Watt
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz vs 6800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	6603 vs 6337
Geekbench - OpenCL	32981 vs 30303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	87.83 vs 74.958
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9009 vs 7664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 2340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9009 vs 7664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 2340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3351

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 570

2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 697 vs 421

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	1792 vs 768
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	697 vs 421

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 570

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6603

6337

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

421

697

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

32981

30303

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

87.83

74.958

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9009

7664

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

2340

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3351

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9009

7664

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

2340

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3351

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T1000	AMD Radeon Pro 570
PassMark - G3D Mark	6603	6337
PassMark - G2D Mark	421	697
Geekbench - OpenCL	32981	30303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	87.83	74.958
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9009	7664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	2340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9009	7664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	2340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	3351
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1070.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		6.94
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		89.457
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		436.958

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T1000	AMD Radeon Pro 570
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 4.0
Code name	TU117	Polaris 20
Launch date	27 May 2019	5 June 2017
Place in performance rating	391	421
Type	Mobile Workstation	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	1105 MHz
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	69.84 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	4.470 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	2.235 TFLOPS
Pipelines	768	1792
Pixel fill rate	46.56 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	69.84 GTexel/s	112.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	120 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	5,700 million
Floating-point performance		3,584 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		241 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	128 GB/s	217.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	6800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5