NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1200 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 4.6x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 230 Watt
  • 4x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 13 August 2018
Core clock speed 1395 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 230 Watt
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz vs 2000 MHz

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

  • Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1455 MHz
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13932 vs 6603
  • Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 815 vs 421
  • 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69812 vs 32981
  • Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 171.616 vs 87.83
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13044 vs 9009
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3718
  • 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3359
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13044 vs 9009
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3718
  • 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3359
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1530 MHz vs 1455 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 13932 vs 6603
PassMark - G2D Mark 815 vs 421
Geekbench - OpenCL 69812 vs 32981
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 171.616 vs 87.83
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13044 vs 9009
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 7164 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 30936 vs 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13044 vs 9009
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 7164 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 30936 vs 3359

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6603
13932
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
421
815
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
32981
69812
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
87.83
171.616
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9009
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9009
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
30936
Name NVIDIA Quadro T1000 AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G3D Mark 6603 13932
PassMark - G2D Mark 421 815
Geekbench - OpenCL 32981 69812
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 87.83 171.616
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9009 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9009 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 30936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1195.863

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name TU117 Vega 10
Launch date 27 May 2019 13 August 2018
Place in performance rating 391 118
Type Mobile Workstation Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Price now $999
Value for money (0-100) 13.37

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1455 MHz 1530 MHz
Core clock speed 1395 MHz 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 69.84 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 4.470 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 2.235 TFLOPS
Pipelines 768
Pixel fill rate 46.56 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 69.84 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 230 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 12,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 128 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 2000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5