NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 4.6x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 230 Watt
- 4x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13932 vs 6603
- Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 815 vs 421
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69812 vs 32981
- Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 171.616 vs 87.83
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13044 vs 9009
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3718
- 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3359
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13044 vs 9009
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3718
- 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3359
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13932 vs 6603 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 815 vs 421 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 69812 vs 32981 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 vs 87.83 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13044 vs 9009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13044 vs 9009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6603 | 13932 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 421 | 815 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 69812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 171.616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 30936 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 30936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 391 | 118 |
Type | Mobile Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $999 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 12,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 |