NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs AMD Radeon R7 370
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and AMD Radeon R7 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 975 MHz
- 1119.2x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 62.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 110 Watt
- 8.2x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 975 MHz
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6618 vs 4521
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.83 vs 72.514
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 7102
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 7102
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 18 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 975 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s vs 62.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 110 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 975 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6618 vs 4521 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 vs 72.514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 vs 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 vs 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3707 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 370
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 605 vs 423
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 86561 vs 32981
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 605 vs 423 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 86561 vs 32981 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 370
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | AMD Radeon R7 370 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6618 | 4521 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 | 605 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 86561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 72.514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3359 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1506.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.267 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.279 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 359.237 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1499 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | AMD Radeon R7 370 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Trinidad |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 18 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 390 | 405 |
Type | Mobile Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 975 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s | 62.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 110 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 2,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,997 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 1024 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 152 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 975 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |