NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and AMD Radeon R9 280 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 933 MHz
• 668.3x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 104.5 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 200 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
• 6.4x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6601 vs 5562
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.83 vs 67.829
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 7957
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3698
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3337
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 7957
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3698
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3337

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280

• 2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 665 vs 421

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6601 5562
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	421 665
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	87.83 67.829
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9009 7957
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9009 7957
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3337

Compare specifications (specs)