NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 636.1x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 109.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6601 vs 5427
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 8276
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3627
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 8276
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3627
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 25 August 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s vs 109.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6601 vs 5427 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 vs 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 vs 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 768
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 694 vs 421
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 768 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 694 vs 421 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6601 | 5427 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 421 | 694 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Code name | TU117 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 25 August 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 391 | 307 |
| Type | Mobile Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1344 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s | 109.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,540 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,634 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 192.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T1000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
ATIRadeon X1900 GT
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 550v
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 575X
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500M
